In 2019 the WHO listed anti-vaxxers as one of the world’s most challenging threats to health. Fast forward to today, and suddenly the plot thickens. It’s almost as if their master plan for 2030 was conceived before they listed an informed public as a health threat. The Supreme Court Has Ruled “Vaccines Are Unavoidably Unsafe”. The Vaccine Court Has Paid Out Over $4.5 Billion In Compensation To Families Due To Vaccine Death And Injury. Doctors Are Given Zero Information On Vaccine Ingredients. Vaccines Contain Mercury, Aluminium, Aborted Foetal Tissue, Sv40 Simeon Monkey Virus That Contains Cancer Cells.
LINK TO BANNED VIDEO https://banned.video/watch?id=5e98b1bb2f9031007e1c6ab6
You Can Say NO, To Mandatory Vaccination And Suffer No Penalty.
INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW STATES – IT IS ILLEGAL TO TAKE AWAY ANYONE’S RIGHT OF INFORMED CONSENT! THAT LAW STILL STANDS!
Informed Consent! The Supreme Court has spoken: even a “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish [your] privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing [your] skin…. this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” (Missouri v McNeely, 2013
members of the public have the right to make informed consent decisions, even if a decision may be considered a “bad” decision by the Government. The Supreme Court indicated, in Thompson v Western States 2016
But that was over a half century ago and international humanitarian law has continued to develop.For example, Australia’s fundamental law recognises the right of Informed Consent, as does the fundamental law of many nations. In the USA there is a federal statute applying Informed Consent to medical experiments and IRBs (Institutional Review Boards).
Significantly, there is also the UN Declaration on BioEthics, negotiated in Geneva, using language similar to the Nuremberg Code and clearly applies to both treatment and experiment:
Article 6 – “Consent – 1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice. 2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice.
You Can Say NO, To Forced Vaccination And Suffer No Penalty. But, You Have To make A Statement In A Legal Way, In A Specific Way, Go To: